Busting The Global Warming Myth: Updated

There is zero evidence of the greenhouse effect of carbon emissions so says a scientist and former alarmist. Empirical evidence and facts do not support the theories or computer models. This is a must read article in the Australian by someone that has been studying it for years, David Evans, who describes himself.

I DEVOTED six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office. I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector.

This what he has to say in part but go read the whole thing as he shreds the alarmist's myths.

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.

Hattip, Ace and Gabriel who have more.
Funny that it is the left that it so gaga over global warming while also claiming science is superior to religion except when scientific emperical data gets in the way of their favorite religion, environmentalism and global warming alarmism.

Update: As always there is much more good stuff debunking the global warming myth at Icecap.